The Glazers are locked in a tense dispute with Sir Jim Ratcliffe regarding the administration of Manchester United, according to recent reports.
Ratcliffe finalized his acquisition of a minority stake in the Red Devils back in 2024, taking charge of the club athletic operations while the heavily criticized Glazer family remained as the majority owners.
However, the Daily Mail reports that the American family, who acquired United in 2005 via a leveraged buyout that loaded debt onto the club, feels dissatisfied with Ratcliffe's leadership.
An insider reportedly told the publication regarding the Ineos period at United: "It's a travesty and not what they expected or were promised. They have never run the club this way."
Another family insider informed ESPN that Ratcliffe "couldn't have masterminded a worse situation".
United have dropped to new lows under Ineos, landing a record-low 15th place in the Premier League, getting knocked out by League Two side Grimsby in the Carabao Cup last term, and currently enduring their worst-ever start to a Premier League campaign.
Even so, the decline had been brewing for some time due to the absent owners.
Only the brilliance of Sir Alex Ferguson and former chief executive David Gill held the club together during the early years of the Glazer tenure, despite obvious asset stripping and a lack of investment.
The present predicament stems directly from years of neglect promoted by owners based far away in America who simply show no regard for the club.
Ratcliffe paid £1.5billion for his minority stake, acquiring just over a quarter of the shares after the Glazers initially demanded £6bn for a complete buyout.
They retain authority over any sale, leaving a potential outcome where Ineos could be bypassed entirely if an outside party purchases the club from the Glazers, though such an event remains unlikely.
United's current share price sits at £15.60, roughly £10 lower than the £25 per share paid by Ratcliffe.
Ineos are trimming their football investments by putting Lausanne-Sport up for sale and lowering their asking price for Nice amidst a fading empire.
Yet United constantly rank as an afterthought for the Glazers, who focus heavily on the NFL and own the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
More than £1bn has been drained out of Old Trafford and Carrington through debt repayments and owner dividends.
Supporters' protests typically go ignored, except following the European Super League fallout, when fans breached the stadium and staged a pitch invasion before a fixture against Liverpool that was postponed.
Ineos can claim something the Glazers cannot, having genuinely invested money into the club.
That investment materialized through an upgraded Carrington training facility and designs for a new 100,000-seater stadium.
That does not excuse the multitude of poor football decisions.
Those choices involve hiring five distinct managers, with a sixth seemingly imminent, botched player transfers, dismissing hundreds of employees for cost savings, and a controversial ticket operation.
Supporters initially afforded Ratcliffe's team more patience than the Glazers, who faced protests even before finalizing their takeover more than 20 years ago, but those fans now direct their frustration at Ineos as well.